Since the Central and Eastern European countries began their transition reforms toward democracy and free market economy, Poland’s experience has stood out as extraordinarily successful when compared to other countries in the region, especially considering its problems inherited from t
- EU cooperation with non-member neighboring countries: the principle of...
- The effects of unconventional monetary policy: what do central banks not...
- Lessons learned for monetary policy from the recent crisis
- Forecasting Financial Stress and the Economic Sensitivity in CEE Countries
- How Think Tanks Shape Social Development Policies
- Institutions of the Russian fiscal federalism: 20 years of evolution
- Employment in Long-term Care. Report on Poland
- Employee financial participation in businesses: Is it worth discussing?
Assessing Development Strategies to Achieve the MDGs in Asia - Macroeconomic Strategies of MDG Achievement in the Kyrgyz Republic
The paper aims at analyzing macroeconomic and financial strategies, which are to ensure achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in the Kyrgyz Republic. The paper is based on results of simulations generated through the application of standard MAMS, a computable general equilibrium model adjusted to the country situation and calibrated with data of Kyrgyzstan. MAMS-model-based simulation results indicate that a continuation of the current policies under the baseline scenario would allow for achieving MDG1 (poverty reduction) only; the country would fall short of the targets for other MDGs. In order to achieve all MDGs, the country needs to increase government spending on MDG-relevant sectors (education, health, water and sanitation) by 7.8-8.1% of GDP per annum in comparison to the baseline scenario. The scenario that combines increased taxes and aid inflows seems to be the most realistic, but it would still require very substantial increases in tax collections and grant aid. The situation is going to be easier, if the economic growth rates 2011-2015 would be higher than 7% per annum. This is possible, if the government would be more successful in implementation of structural reforms, FDI and private domestic investments attraction and mobilization of resources for infrastructure development. Another possible way out is a substantial increase in government spending efficiency allowing for receiving higher social returns for money spent.
Subscribe to CASE mailing list
Publications by series
Publications by topic
- Macroeconomics and macroeconomic policy
- Trade, economic integration and globalization
- Financial sector
- Labor market, social policy and social services
- Private sector development, innovations, knowledge-based economy
- Institutional reforms
- Infrastructure, energy and climate change
- Post-communist transition and development issues